Pick a topic, a related piece of media, and a CS195 classmate and talk about it for 7-10 minutes! Review others! Read below for more detail.
One of the learning goals of this course is to share and engage your opinions about the social implications of computing technology, particularly with others. Since most of you will engage with these implications through spoken conversation, we’re hoping that this will be a better simulation of what you will do in practice—as opposed to a written essay.
You will record a 7-10 minute audio file of you talking with one other person in the course. This does not have to be an Audible/Spotify-level production, but the audio quality should be clear enough such that an automatic captioner would reasonably be able to pick up on most words. We share some resources for recording audio at the end of this assignment.
The goal of this assignment is a conversation between classmates. You do not need to submit a written script (beyond any automatic transcription; see below). However, both you and your partner should speak roughly an equal amount of time, and there shouldn’t be too many extra-long pauses (e.g., 5-10 seconds of pausing every once in a while is fine, but a longer amount of silence is not). Heuristically, aim for the amount of speaking you see in a podcast or internet stream. With these two things in mind (no script required, but conversation should keep both parties engaged), if you need it, we encourage you to outline some thoughts ahead of time. You may need to do several recordings!
You must pick a topic related to what we will have covered in lecture, from Lecture 1: Free Speech up to and including Lecture 06: Government Censorship and Surveillance. (It cannot involve AI - you will have a chance to talk about AI in the second and final podcast assignment of this course.)
As part of your discussion, cite or discuss one news article, tweet, video from Tiktok/YouTube/etc., academic paper, or other relevant form of media that is outside of the ones discussed or shared in class. You can include multiple of these if that’s what you want to talk about, but just one is required for submission.
You should “register” you and your partner as a group via this Google Form by Mon 10/02, 11:59pm. Unassigned students by this time will be automatically assigned within 24 hours and notified via email.
We will have a pinned Ed post to search for project partners. If you post on this thread, we ask that you mark your threads as “resolved” to help other students search.
Groups are two students; no groups of three will be permitted for this assignment.
Submit your podcast via bCourses (see the assignment link at the top of this page).
Since this is a pair assignment, if all goes well your assignment will receive four anonymous peer reviews. Each person therefore will have to submit two peer reviews (see “Peer Review” below).
A passing grade on a podcast is such that all rubric categories are marked “Satisfactory” by all peer reviewers.
Category | 1 point | 0 points |
---|---|---|
Uploaded file is a text file (.vtt, .txt, PDF, word doc, etc.) or an audio file that contains the group conversation. | Satisfactory | File is a video file / File is not the conversation file. |
Conversation topic is pertinent to one (or more) of the specified lectures. | Satisfactory | Conversation is not pertinent to class. |
The conversation cites or discusses the uploaded piece of media (news article, tweet, video from Tiktok/YouTube/etc., academic paper) in a relevant manner. | Satisfactory | Conversation neither cites nor discusses a new piece of media outside of class resources. |
Conversation does not have particularly long pauses (e.g., longer than 15 seconds) and is within time limit. | Satisfactory | Conversation includes an extra-long pause / contains so many pauses such that it cannot be considered satisfying the 7-10 minute requirement / Conversation exceeds 7-10 minutes or thereabouts. |
Conversation feels relatively balanced, i.e., it flows back and forth. | Satisfactory | One person is dominating the speaking time / One person takes the first half, then the other person takes the second half. |
Instructional staff will spot-review some podcasts and will explicitly re-review any submissions that do not achieve “Satisfactory” in all rubric items.
As part of the grading process for this course, each person will anonymously submit two peer reviews, which includes submitting the above rubric as well as posting a single “Reply” as a text comment on the assignment on bCourses. Peer Reviews will be randomly assigned via bCourses. “Reply” guidelines
The easiest way to make an audio file AND an automatically generated transcript is to record your conversation via Zoom.